Impact of vicarious learning through peer observation during simulation on student behavioural measures
Introduction: Having student peers observe and provide feedback has been found to aid learning in nursing and other health professions training settings (Cushing, Abbott, Lothian, Hall, & Westwood, 2011; Eldridge, Bear, Wayne, & Perea, 2013). Prior studies have documented student perceptions about the value of these experiences, but few studies examine the impact of these modalities on student behavioural outcomes. In this study, we describe the use of peer observation to evaluate student performance during a home visit simulation scenario using a standardised patient to explore whether serving as a peer observer supports vicarious learning to promote skill development in areas of assessment, communication, critical thinking and technical skills.
Methods: Groups of four students were subdivided into dyads, with one pair of students serving as peer evaluators and one pair being engaged in a home visit simulation scenario using a standardised patient. Students then reversed roles. Peer observers and faculty members rated student behaviours using the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (CSEI), which examines technical, critical thinking, assessment and communication skills.
Results: Groups of students who witnessed the scenario as peer evaluator prior to engaging in the simulation experience scored significantly higher mean scores on communication and assessment measures than those participating in the scenario first. In addition, peers tended to score their colleagues lower than faculty evaluators.
Conclusions: Findings from this study indicate that integrating peer observation into simulation experiences can enhance student learning, particularly in the areas of assessment and communication.
Adamson, K. A., Parsons, M. E., Hawkins, K., Manz, J. A., Todd, M., & Hercinger, M. (2011). Reliability and internal consistency findings from the C-SEI. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(10), 583‒586. doi:10.3928/01484834-20110715-02
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, DC: Author.
Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium of motivation (pp. 211‒269). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bosse, H., Schultz, J., Nickel, M., Lutz, T., Möltner, A., Jünger, J., & Nikendei, C. (2012). The effect of using standardized patients or peer role play on ratings of undergraduate communication training: A randomized controlled trial. Patient Education Counseling, 87(3), 300‒306.
Chaves, J., Baker, C., Chaves, J., & Fisher, M. (2006). Self, peer, and tutor assessments of MSN competencies using the PBL-Evaluator. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(1), 25–31.
Cushing, A., Abbott, S., Lothian, D., Hall, A., & Westwood, O. (2011). Peer feedback as an aid to learning: What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now! Medical Teacher, 33(2), e105‒e112. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.542522
Eldredge, J. D., Bear, D. G., Wayne, S. J., & Perea, P. P. (2013). Student peer assessment in evidence-based medicine (EBM) searching skills training: An experiment. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 244‒251. doi:10.3163/1536 -5050.101.4.003
Guhde, J. (2010). Clinical decision-making: Using online exercises and patient simulation to improve students’ clinical decision-making. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(6), 387‒389. doi:10.1043/1536-5026-31.6.387
Hoover, J., Giambatista, R. C., & Belkin, L. Y. (2012). Eyes on, hands on: Vicarious observational learning as an enhancement of direct experience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 591‒608. doi:10.5465/ amle.2010.0102
Jeffries, P. R. (Ed.). (2007). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Jensen, R. (2013). Clinical reasoning during simulation: Comparison of student and faculty ratings. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(1), 23‒28. doi:10.1016/j. nepr.2012.07.001
Kim-Godwin, Y., Livsey, K., Ezzell, D., Highsmith, C., Winslow, H., & Aikman, A. N. (2013). Students like peer evaluation during home visit simulation experiences. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(11), e535‒42. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.06.002
Lanning, S., Brickhouse, T., Gunsolley, J., Ranson, S., & Willett, R. (2011). Communication skills instruction: An analysis of self, peer-group, student instructors and faculty assessment. Patient Education & Counseling, 83(2), 145‒151. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.024
Mantesso, J., Petrucka, P., & Bassendowski, S. (2008). Continuing professional competence: Peer feedback success from determination of nurse locus
of control. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(5), 200‒207. doi:10.3928/00220124-20080501-02
Moineau, G., Power, B., Pion, A. J., Wood, T. J., & Humphrey-Murto, S. (2011). Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE. Medical Education, 45(2), 183‒191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03800.x
Monfardini, E., Gazzola, V., Boussaoud, D., Brovelli, A., Keysers, C., & Wicker, B. (2013). Vicarious neural processing of outcomes during observational learning. Plos ONE, 8(9), 1‒16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073879
Perera, J., Mohamadou, G., & Kaur, S. (2010). The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: Evaluation using a controlled trial. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 185‒193. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9191-1
Roberts, D. (2008). Learning in clinical practice: The importance of peers. Nursing Standard, 23(12), 35‒41.
Rout, A., & Roberts, P. (2008). Peer review in nursing and midwifery: A literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17 (4), 427‒442. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2702.2007.01934.x
Rush, S., Firth, T., Burke, L., & Marks-Maran, D. (2012). Implementation and evaluation of peer assessment of clinical skills for first year student nurses. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(4), 219‒226. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.01.014
Sawyer, A., & Roberts, P. (2005). A study finds support for peer review of clinical assessments. Nursing Standard, 19(27), 21.
Secomb, J. (2008). A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(6), 703‒716. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2702.2007.01954.x
Stegmann, K., Pilz, F., Siebeck, M., & Fischer, F. (2012). Vicarious learning during simulations: Is it more effective than hands-on training? Medical Education, 46(10), 1001‒1008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04344.x
Todd, M., Manz, J., Hawkins, K., Parsons, M., & Hercinger, M. (2008). The development of a quantitative evaluation tool for simulations in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5, 1‒17. doi:10.2202/1548-923X.1705
- There are currently no refbacks.