Making reasoning visible through process mapping in digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i4.796

Keywords:

clinical reasoning, health professional education, optometry education, simulation-based education, assessment

Abstract

Introduction: Making the processes underpinning students’ approaches to given tasks visible is challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the viability of microanalysis of a digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessment.

Methods: Eighty-five second-year optometry students were invited to participate in recall interviews. Through thematic analysis, we constructed a codebook and through microanalysis, process maps were created.

Results: The codebook had four themes and 27 codes. The 53 process maps were synthesised to demonstrate decision making.

Conclusion: Microanalysis could be used in future studies to explore underlying cognitive processes in digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessment in optometry education.

References

Audétat, M.-C., Laurin, S., Dory, V., Charlin, B., & Nendaz, M. R. (2017). Diagnosis and management of clinical reasoning difficulties: Part I. Clinical reasoning supervision and educational diagnosis. Medical Teacher, 39(8), 792–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1331033

Barrows, H. S., & Feltovich, P. J. (1987). The clinical reasoning process. Medical Education, 21(2), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00671.x

Callan, G. L., Rubenstein, L. D., Ridgley, L. M., & McCall, J. R. (2021). Measuring self-regulated learning during creative problem-solving with SRL microanalysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000238

Cooper, N., Bartlett, M., Gay, S., Hammond, A., Lillicrap, M., Matthan, J., & Singh, M. (2021). Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 43(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343

Daniel, M., Rencic, J., Durning, S. J., Holmboe, E., Santen, S. A., Lang, V., Ratcliffe, T., Gordon, D., Heist, B., Lubarsky, S., Estrada, C. A., Ballard, T., Artino, A. R., Jr., Sergio Da Silva, A., Cleary, T., Stojan, J., & Gruppen, L. D. (2019). Clinical reasoning assessment methods: A scoping review and practical guidance. Academic Medicine, 94(6), 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002618

Edgar, A., Ainge, L., Backhouse, S., & Armitage, J. (2022). A cohort study for the development and validation of a reflective inventory to quantify diagnostic reasoning skills in optometry practice. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), Article 536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03493-6

Edgar, A., Macfarlane, S., Kiddell, E., Armitage, J., & Wood-Bradley, R. (2022). The perceived value and impact of virtual simulation-based education on students’ learning: A mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), Article 823. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03912-8

Shlonsky, A., Featherston, R., Galvin, K. L., Vogel, A. P., Granger, C. L., Lewis, C., Luong, M.-L., & Downie, L. E. (2019). Interventions to mitigate cognitive biases in the decision making of eye care professionals: A systematic review. Optometry and Vision Science, 96(11), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001445

Smith, P., & Corrigan, G. (2018). How learners learn: A new microanalytic assessment method to map decision-making. Medical Teacher, 40(12), 1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1426838

Yang, F., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Zhou, M. H., Shu, J., Fu, B., & Hu, H. (2019). Improving clinical judgment by simulation: A randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Edgar, A., Estaphan, S., Chong, L., Armitage, J., Ainge, L., & Corrigan, G. (2024). Making reasoning visible through process mapping in digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessments. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 25(4), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i4.796

Issue

Section

Short Report