Making reasoning visible through process mapping in digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i4.796Keywords:
clinical reasoning, health professional education, optometry education, simulation-based education, assessmentAbstract
Introduction: Making the processes underpinning students’ approaches to given tasks visible is challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the viability of microanalysis of a digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessment.
Methods: Eighty-five second-year optometry students were invited to participate in recall interviews. Through thematic analysis, we constructed a codebook and through microanalysis, process maps were created.
Results: The codebook had four themes and 27 codes. The 53 process maps were synthesised to demonstrate decision making.
Conclusion: Microanalysis could be used in future studies to explore underlying cognitive processes in digitally simulated clinical reasoning assessment in optometry education.
References
Audétat, M.-C., Laurin, S., Dory, V., Charlin, B., & Nendaz, M. R. (2017). Diagnosis and management of clinical reasoning difficulties: Part I. Clinical reasoning supervision and educational diagnosis. Medical Teacher, 39(8), 792–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1331033
Barrows, H. S., & Feltovich, P. J. (1987). The clinical reasoning process. Medical Education, 21(2), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00671.x
Callan, G. L., Rubenstein, L. D., Ridgley, L. M., & McCall, J. R. (2021). Measuring self-regulated learning during creative problem-solving with SRL microanalysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000238
Cooper, N., Bartlett, M., Gay, S., Hammond, A., Lillicrap, M., Matthan, J., & Singh, M. (2021). Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 43(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343
Daniel, M., Rencic, J., Durning, S. J., Holmboe, E., Santen, S. A., Lang, V., Ratcliffe, T., Gordon, D., Heist, B., Lubarsky, S., Estrada, C. A., Ballard, T., Artino, A. R., Jr., Sergio Da Silva, A., Cleary, T., Stojan, J., & Gruppen, L. D. (2019). Clinical reasoning assessment methods: A scoping review and practical guidance. Academic Medicine, 94(6), 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002618
Edgar, A., Ainge, L., Backhouse, S., & Armitage, J. (2022). A cohort study for the development and validation of a reflective inventory to quantify diagnostic reasoning skills in optometry practice. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), Article 536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03493-6
Edgar, A., Macfarlane, S., Kiddell, E., Armitage, J., & Wood-Bradley, R. (2022). The perceived value and impact of virtual simulation-based education on students’ learning: A mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), Article 823. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03912-8
Shlonsky, A., Featherston, R., Galvin, K. L., Vogel, A. P., Granger, C. L., Lewis, C., Luong, M.-L., & Downie, L. E. (2019). Interventions to mitigate cognitive biases in the decision making of eye care professionals: A systematic review. Optometry and Vision Science, 96(11), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001445
Smith, P., & Corrigan, G. (2018). How learners learn: A new microanalytic assessment method to map decision-making. Medical Teacher, 40(12), 1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1426838
Yang, F., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Zhou, M. H., Shu, J., Fu, B., & Hu, H. (2019). Improving clinical judgment by simulation: A randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.