Enriching research practices through knowledge about Indigenous research methodologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.758Keywords:
health professional education research, qualitative research, research methodology, interface researchAbstract
Introduction
Learning about Indigenous research paradigms and methodologies offers insights and reflexive opportunities for those who seek to improve their research practice. This paper explores how research at the ‘interface’ can enrich scholarly inquiry across the academy. Whilst a single paper cannot do justice to the sophistication and nuance of Indigenous methodologies, as an authorship team of one Indigenous and two non-Indigenous academics, and through our established relationship and subsequent conversations, we present in this paper seven distilled methodological learnings that can enrich standard qualitative research practice. We predominantly explored the work of Indigenous scholars worldwide, and where relevant have drawn on non-Indigenous scholars where there may be ‘interface’ compatibilities. We also build off some of our previous work such as Andrews (2020a, 2020b), Andrews (2021) and Bolton and Andrews (2018).
It is very important to clearly state that we are not suggesting readers, particularly non-Indigenous readers, use this paper as a template for Indigenous research, or as a guide for conducting research with Indigenous peoples and communities. Rather, our intention is to share our personal learnings about Indigenous research with a view to bridging methodological understanding to achieve high quality qualitative research. Indigenous researchers have sought to navigate the interface between Indigenous and western research to generate new knowledge that reflects the interests, values and priorities of Indigenous peoples. The last twenty-five years has seen significant effort by Indigenous scholars across the globe to establish an Indigenous academic research agenda and pioneer change in research practices. The interface between Indigenous and western knowledge systems has much to offer research as a basis for the generation of new knowledge (Durie, 2004; Martin, 2008). It is at this interface, or intersection between two knowledges, that we make connections and offer our insights.
This paper is divided into four sections: Beginning, Middle, Reflective End and New Beginnings, a framework drawn from our work. Within these four sections are seven key methodological reflections under the sub-headings: Understanding place in research, Positionality, Worldviews in research, Privileging knowledges, Relational accountability, Storytelling as methodology and Circular research processes, and at each sub-heading is our key learnings. This is shown in Figure 1, noting the arrows grow in size as we approach ‘Beginning Again’ as a way of illustrating the enriching of knowledges and practices as the learning process loops iteratively.
References
Ajjawi, R. (2022). Problematising voice in qualitative health professional education research. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 23(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i2.660
Andrews, S. (2020a). Cloaked in strength—how possum skin cloaking can support Aboriginal women’s voice in family violence research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 2(16), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120917483
Andrews, S. (2020b). Qualitative analysis at the interface of Indigenous and Western knowledge systems: The herringbone stitch model. Qualitative Research, 21(6), 939–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120965365
Andrews, S. (2021). Cloaked in strength: An exploration of Aboriginal mothers’ experiences of family violence and the role of cultural practice as a tool of engagement, resilience and resistance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
Archibald, J. A., Lee-Morgan, J., De Santolo, J., & Smith, L. T. (2019). Decolonizing research: Indigenous storywork as methodology. ZED Books.
Barlo, S., Boyd, W. E., Hughes, M., Wilson, S., & Pelizzon, A. (2021). Yarning as protected space: Relational accountability in research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120986151
Behrendt, L. (2021). The weaving power of Indigenous storytelling: Personal reflections on the impact of COVID-19 and the response of Indigenous communities. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 154, 85–90. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/157681
Bolton, J., & Andrews, S. (2018). “I learnt more than from any lecture”: Indigenous space and place for teaching Indigenous health to physiotherapy students. Physical Therapy Reviews, 23(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2017.1341744
Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.). (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. (Vols. 1–2). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Taylor and Francis.
Curtis, E. (2016). Indigenous positioning in health research: The importance of Kaupapa Māori theory-informed practice. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 12(4), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.20507/AlterNative.2016.12.4.5
Durie, M. (2004, March 2–21). Exploring the interface between science and indigenous knowledge [Paper presentation]. 5th APEC Research and Development Leaders Forum, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Durie, M. (2005). Indigenous knowledge within a global knowledge system. Higher Education Policy, 18(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300092
Fredericks, B. L. (2009). The epistemology that maintains white race privilege, power and control of Indigenous studies and Indigenous peoples’ participation in universities. Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association e-Journal, 5(1), 1–12.
Ganesharajah, C. (2009). Indigenous health and wellbeing: The importance of country. Native title research report. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.
Han, H., Youm, J., Tucker, C., Teal, C. R., Rougas, S., Park, Y. S., J. Mooney, C., L. Hanson, J., & Berry, A. (2022). Research methodologies in health professions education publications: Breadth and rigor. Academic Medicine, 97(11S), S54–S62. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004911
Jackson, M. (2008). Restoring the nation: Removing the constancy of terror [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of Traditional Knowledge Conference (pp. 27–33).
Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2016). It’s a story, not a study: Writing an effective research paper. Academic Medicine, 91(12), e12. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001389
Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2021). Story, not study: 30 brief lessons to inspire health researchers as writers. Innovation and Change in Professional Education (Vol. 19). Springer.
Lowitja Institute. (2021). Research pathways: Information sheet series. Indigenous data governance and sovereignty. https://www.lowitja.org.au/icms_docs/328550_data-governance-and-sovereignty.pdf
Macfarlane, S., Macfarlane, A., & Gillon, G. (2015). Sharing the food baskets of knowledge: Creating space for a blending of streams. In A. Macfarlane, S. Macfarlane, & M. Webber (Eds.), Sociocultural realities: Exploring new horizons (pp. 52–67). Canterbury University Press.
MacLeod, A., Ellaway, R. H., Paradis, E., Park, Y. S., Young, M., & Varpio, L. (2020). Being edgy in health professions education: Concluding the philosophy of science series. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 995–998. https:/doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003250
Martin, K. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re‐search. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838
Martin, K. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Pademelon Press.
McCartan, J., Brimblecombe, J., & Adams, K. (2022). Methodological tensions for non-Indigenous people in Indigenous research: A critique of critical discourse analysis in the Australian context. Social Science and Humanities Open, 6(1), Article 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100282
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S., & Bolt, R. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for Indigenous studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 120–140.
Nakata, S., & Maddison, S. (2020). Working through the problems: Negotiating friendship, producing results. In A. Hay (Ed.), Griffith review 67: Matters of trust (pp. 125–134). https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/working-through-the-problems/
Neale, M., & Kelly, L. (2020). Songlines: The power and the promise. First Knowledges. Thames & Hudson, Australia.
Paton, M., Naidu, T., Wyatt, T. R., Oni, O., Lorello, G. R., Najeeb, U., Feilchenfeld, Z., Waterman, S. J., Whitehead, C. R., & Kuper, A. (2020). Dismantling the master's house: New ways of knowing for equity and social justice in health professions education. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 25(5), 1107–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10006-x
Reich, J. A. (2021). Power, positionality, and the ethics of care in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 44, 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4
Remedios, L., Andrews, S., Bolton, J., & Clements, T. (2018). Using Indigenous knowledges to guide physiotherapy students towards culturally safe practice– The Health Advocate, 46, 32–33. https://ahha.asn.au/system/files/docs/publications/feb2018_tha_c2.pdf
Ribeiro, A. P. (2020). Soberania intellectual [Intellectual sovereignty]. Memoirs Newsletter, 89, 1–4. https://memoirs.ces.uc.pt/index.php?id=22153&id_lingua=1&pag=22823
Seamon, D. (2018). Merleau-Ponty, lived body, and place: Toward a phenomenology of human situatedness. In T. Hünefeldt & Schlitte, A. (Eds.), Situatedness and place (pp. 41–66). Springer Cham.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
Thomas, A., Lubarsky, S., Varpio, L., Durning, S. J., & Young, M. E. (2020). Scoping reviews in health professions education: Challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 25(4), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09932-2
Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
Wilson, D., Mikahere-Hall, A., & Sherwood, J. (2022). Using indigenous kaupapa Māori research methodology with constructivist grounded theory: Generating a theoretical explanation of indigenous women’s realities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(3), 375–390, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1897756
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.