The influence of clinical practice video on learning conversations in postgraduate medical education: A scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i3.695Keywords:
coaching, feedback, learning conversation, medical education, postgraduate medical education, video, video-assisted coaching, video feedback, video reviewAbstract
Introduction: Studies of learning conversations in medical education suggest these interactions can be supervisor driven, monologic and may involve poor recall of events. Educators often use camouflaged comments to avoid upsetting learners, which can interfere with meaning making. Using video of clinical practice within learning conversations could address some of these potential limitations. Despite educators using video of clinical practice in learning conversations for decades, we could find no synthesis of empirical studies to provide insight into the influence of video in learning conversations. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to answer the question “How does video of clinical practice influence learning conversations in post-graduate medical education?”
Methods: We employed a scoping review methodology. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and ERIC databases were searched for articles from 1 January 2010 to 1 January 2022. Major inclusion criteria were postgraduate medical learners and video of clinical practice that was used in a learning conversation. The qualitative data relating to video’s influence on learning conversations were synthesised and thematically analysed.
Results: Five articles were included in the synthesis. We generated four themes from the qualitative data about the influence of video on the learning conversation. Video: (1) captures performance data that can be co-analysed, (2) enables the learning conversation to take place in a different environment, (3) changes the teaching approaches of educators and (4) may promote learner agency and voice.
Conclusion: Video may influence learning conversations, and video’s influence is likely entangled with the educational design associated with its use. No study directly addressed the phenomenon of how video influences learning conversations, and further study is required in this area.
References
Ali, A. A., & Miller, E. T. (2018). Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing in health education: An integrative review. The Journal of Nursing Education, 57(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180102-04
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bearman, M., & Dawson, P. (2013). Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Medical Education, 47(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12092
Braff, L., & Nelson, K. (2022). The global north: Introducing the region. In N. Fernandez & K. Nelson (Eds.), Gendered lives: Global issues (pp. 289–307). State University of New York. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/genderedlives/chapter/chapter-15-the-global-north-introducing-the-region/
Brand, P. L. P., Jaarsma, A. D. C., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2020). Driving lesson or driving test? Perspectives on Medical Education, 10(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00617-w
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bull, N. B., Silverman, C. D., & Bonrath, E. M. (2020). Targeted surgical coaching can improve operative self-assessment ability: A single-blinded nonrandomized trial. Surgery, 167(2), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.08.002
Chabris, C. F., & Simons, D. J. (2010). The invisible gorilla: And other ways our intuition deceives us. HarperCollins.
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 48(7), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12432
Cook, D. A., Erwin, P. J., & Triola, M. M. (2010). Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 85(10), 1589–1602. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13
Davis, K., Drey, N., & Gould, D. (2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(10), 1386–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010
Dohms, M. C., Collares, C. F., & Tibério, I. C. (2020). Video-based feedback using real consultations for a formative assessment in communication skills. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1955-6
Eeckhout, T., Gerits, M., Bouquillon, D., & Schoenmakers, B. (2016). Video training with peer feedback in real-time consultation: Acceptability and feasibility in a general-practice setting. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 92(1090), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133633
Epistemonikos. (n.d.). Home page. Retrieved November 16, 2020, from https://www.epistemonikos.org/
Frank, J. R., Snell, L., & Sherbino, J. (Eds.). (2015). CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. https://www.royalcollege.ca/content/dam/document/standards-and-accreditation/2015-canmeds-framework-reduced-e.pdf
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum. https://envs.ucsc.edu/internships/internship-readings/freire-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed.pdf
Garden, A. L., Le Fevre, D. M., Waddington, H. L., & Weller, J. M. (2015). Debriefing after simulation-based non-technical skill training in healthcare: A systematic review of effective practice. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 43(3), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X1504300303
Goldman, L. I., Maier, W. P., Rosemond, G. P., Saltzman, S. W., & Cramer, L. M. (1969). Teaching surgical technique by the critical review of videotaped performance: The surgical instant replay. Surgery, 66(1), 237–241.
Hall, J. M., & Pyper, J. S. (2021). Exploring the nature and focus of feedback when using video playback in gynecology laparoscopy training. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 12(6), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.71455
Hu, Y.-Y., Mazer, L. M., Yule, S. J., Arriaga, A. F., Greenberg, C. C., Lipsitz, S. R., Gawande, A. A., & Smink, D. S. (2017). Complementing operating room teaching with video-based coaching. JAMA Surgery, 152(4), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4619
Hu, Y.-Y., Peyre, S. E., Arriaga, A. F., Osteen, R. T., Corso, K. A., Weiser, T. G., Swanson, R. S., Ashley, S. W., Raut, C. P., Zinner, M. J., Gawande, A. A., & Greenberg, C. C. (2012). Postgame analysis: Using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 214(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.009
Huang, A. Y., Molloy, E., Ryan, A., & Bearman, M. (2022). Scoping literature review dataset: How does video of clinical practice influence learning conversations in postgraduate medical education? [dataset]. University of Melbourne. https://doi.org/10.26188/20101121
Iedema, R., Carroll, K., Collier, A., Hor, S., Mesman, J., & Wyer, M. (2019). Video-reflexive ethnography in health research and healthcare improvement: Theory and application. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351248013
Isreb, S., Attwood, S., Hesselgreaves, H., McLachlan, J., & Illing, J. (2021). Synchronized video-review as a tool to enhance reflection and feedback: A design-based feasibility study. Journal of Surgical Education, 78(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.014
Jain, N. S., Schwarzkopf, R., & Scolaro, J. A. (2017). Video review as a tool to improve orthopedic residents׳ performance of closed manipulative reductions. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(4), 663–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.003
Johnson, C. E., Keating, J. L., Farlie, M. K., Kent, F., Leech, M., & Molloy, E. K. (2019). Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: An observational study and systematic analysis. BMC Medical Education, 19, Article 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1524-z
Johnson, C. E., Watling, C. J., Keating, J. L., & Molloy, E. K. (2020). Effective feedback conversations in clinical practice. In D. Nestel, G. Reedy, L. McKenna, & S. Gough (Eds.), Clinical education for the health professions: Theory and practice (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_53-1
Krogh, K., Bearman, M., & Nestel, D. (2015). Expert practice of video-assisted debriefing: An Australian qualitative study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(3), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.003
Lanier, C., Dominice Dao, M., Hudelson, P., Cerutti, B., & Junod Perron, N. (2017). Learning to use electronic health records: Can we stay patient-centered? A pre-post intervention study with family medicine residents. BMC Family Practice, 18, Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0640-2
Levett-Jones, T., & Lapkin, S. (2014). A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020
Martin, R. (Ed.). (2021). The management of procedure-induced anxiety in children. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108913317.004
Mazer, L. M., Hu, Y.-Y., Arriaga, A. F., Greenberg, C. C., Lipsitz, S. R., Gawande, A. A., Smink, D. S., & Yule, S. J. (2018). Evaluating surgical coaching: A mixed methods approach reveals more than surveys alone. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(6), 1520–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.009
Merriam, S. B., Spataro, B., Hamm, M. E., McNeil, M. A., & DiNardo, D. J. (2018). Video observation with guided reflection: A method for continuing teaching education. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 10(4), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-17-00692.1
Mills, L. M., Boscardin, C., Joyce, E. A., ten Cate, O., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2021). Emotion in remediation: A scoping review of the medical education literature. Medical Education, 55(12), 1350–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14605
Molloy, E. (2009). Time to pause: Giving and receiving feedback in clinical education. In C. Delany & E. Molloy (Eds.), Clinical education in the health professions (pp. 128–146). Churchill Livingston Elsevier.
Molloy, E., & Bearman, M. (2019). Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility: "Intellectual candour" in health professions education. Medical Education, 53(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13649
Moore, M. D., Abelson, J. S., O’Mahoney, P., Bagautdinov, I., Yeo, H., & Watkins, A. C. (2018). Using GoPro to give video-assisted operative feedback for surgery residents: A feasibility and utility assessment. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(2), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.024
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Murphy, P., Nestel, D., & Gormley, G. J. (2019). Words matter: Towards a new lexicon for "nontechnical skills" training. Advances in Simulation, 4, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0098-5
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). (n.d.). Welcome to PROSPERO. University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Retrieved November 16, 2020, from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
Ng, Y. X., Koh, Z. Y. K., Yap, H. W., Tay, K. T., Tan, X. H., Ong, Y. T., Tan, L. H. E., Chin, A. M. C., Toh, Y. P., Shivananda, S., Compton, S., Mason, S., Kanesvaran, R., & Krishna, L. (2020). Assessing mentoring: A scoping review of mentoring assessment tools in internal medicine between 1990 and 2019. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232511
Noordman, J., Post, B., van Dartel, A. A. M., Slits, J. M. A., & olde Hartman, T. C. (2019). Training residents in patient-centred communication and empathy: Evaluation from patients, observers and residents. BMC Medical Education, 19, Article 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1555-5
Parker, H., Farrell, O., Bethune, R., Hodgetts, A., & Mattick, K. (2019). Pharmacist-led, video-stimulated feedback to reduce prescribing errors in doctors-in-training: A mixed methods evaluation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 85(10), 2405–2413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14065
Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Trico, A., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
Phillips, R., & Allbutt, H. (2021). Peer feedback on video consultations for GPST1s in S.E. Scotland: A pilot study using the framework method. Education for Primary Care : An Official Publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors, 32(6), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2021.1920473
Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Ginsburg, S., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2019). Feedback redefined: Principles and practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(5), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2
Ryg, P. A., Hafler, J. P., & Forster, S. H. (2016). The efficacy of residents as teachers in an ophthalmology module. Journal of Surgical Education, 73(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.014
Sahyouni, R., Moshtaghi, O., Tran, D. K., Kaloostian, S., Rajaii, R., Bustillo, D., & Chen, J. W. (2017). Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery. Surgical Neurology International, 8, Article 68. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_277_16
Scarff, C. E., Bearman, M., Chiavaroli, N., & Trumble, S. (2019a). Keeping mum in clinical supervision: Private thoughts and public judgements. Medical Education, 53(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13728
Scarff, C. E., Bearman, M., Chiavaroli, N., & Trumble, S. (2019b). Trainees’ perspectives of assessment messages: A narrative systematic review. Medical Education, 53(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13775
Sherman, M., Nissly, T., Friedrichsen, S., & Wootten, M. (2018). Video review process: Enhancing impact and resident/faculty satisfaction. Peer-Reviewed Reports in Medical Education Research, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2018.152628
Tavares, W., Eppich, W., Cheng, A., Miller, S., Teunissen, P. W., Watling, C. J., & Sargeant, J. (2020). Learning conversations: An analysis of the theoretical roots and their manifestations of feedback and debriefing in medical education. Academic Medicine, 95(7), 1020–1025. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002932
Watling, C., LaDonna, K. A., Lingard, L., Voyer, S., & Hatala, R. (2016). "Sometimes the work just needs to be done": Socio-cultural influences on direct observation in medical training. Medical Education, 50(10), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13062
Watling, C., & Lingard, L. (2012). Toward meaningful evaluation of medical trainees: The influence of participants’ perceptions of the process. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9223-x
Wouda, J. C., & van de Wiel, H. B. M. (2014). The effects of self-assessment and supervisor feedback on residents’ patient-education competency using videoed outpatient consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 97(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.023
Zhang, H., Goh, S. H. L., Wu, X. V., Wang, W., & Mörelius, E. (2019). Prelicensure nursing students’ perspectives on video-assisted debriefing following high fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 79, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.001
Zhang, H., Mörelius, E., Goh, S. H. L., & Wang, W. (2019). Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing in simulation-based health professions education: A systematic review of quantitative evidence. Nurse Educator, 44(3), E1–E6. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000562
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.
