Skills for the aspiring surgeon in Australia: A needs assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v24i2.658Keywords:
education, surgical training, skills competency, professional skills, general surgery, specialty surgeryAbstract
Introduction: The increasing duration of time before the commencement of formal surgical education training (SET) in Australia has emphasised the need for pre-SET “aspiring” surgical trainees to develop greater competency in both generic and specialty-specific skills to fulfil these public hospital positions, however there is no formalised curriculum or guide. This paper investigates current inconsistencies in the training of Australian pre-SET aspiring surgical trainees and attempts to define which skills are required.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with pre-SET supervisors in general and specialty surgery fields at a large tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, to assess expectations and competencies of pre-SET surgical trainees. A mixed-method analysis was used with inductive content analysis used for the rich interview data and quantitative analysis of 5-point Likert scale scores for the essential skills syllabus and eligibility requirements.
Results: Eighteen interviews were conducted. Three major themes arose from inductive content analysis: participants perceived that pre-SET trainees met basic expectations, significant variability in skill level exists between trainees, and simulation was suggested as a potential solution to address gaps in training. Quantitative analysis of Likert scores suggests that trainee competency was inadequate (or not required) for several skills. For general surgery, trainee competency was deemed inadequate for proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy and appendicectomy.
Conclusions: There is a critical need to clearly define the skills expected of pre-SET trainees and their role within the healthcare system. This study provides insights into the content of that skillset, which could be used to design relevant and useful training programs for pre-SET trainees. The value of simulation training was universally noted by participants. They believed that this could improve competency for pre-SET trainees in technical and non-technical skills.
References
American Board of Surgery (ABS). (2021). Training requirements: General surgery. https://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_training
Bell, R. H., Jr., Biester, T. W., Tabuenca, A., Rhodes, R. S., Cofer, J. B., Britt, L. D., & Lewis, F. R., Jr. (2009). Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: A gap between expectation and experience. Annals of Surgery, 249(5), 719–724. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a38e59
Brown, K. G. M., & Storey, C. E. (2016). Acquiring surgical skills: The history of surgical teaching at the University of Sydney 1883–2014. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 86(6), 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13469
Gostlow, H., Marlow, N., Babidge, W., & Maddern, G. (2017). Systematic review of voluntary participation in simulation-based laparoscopic skills training: Motivators and barriers for surgical trainee attendance. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(2), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.007
Hertz, P., Houlind, K., Jepsen, J., Bundgaard, L., Jensen, P., Friis, M., Konge, L., & Bjerrum, F. (2022). Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: A Delphi study. Surgical Endoscopy, 36(7), 4786–4794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08821-3
Mitchell, R., Milford, W. J., Bonning, M., Markwell, A., & Roberts-Thomson, R. (2013). Unaccredited registrar positions in Australian public hospitals: Is it time for a rethink? Australian Health Review, 37(4), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13009
NSW Ministry of Health. (2018). Your training and wellbeing matters. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/workforce/culture/Documents/yts-2018-jmo.pdf
NSW Ministry of Health. (2020). Review of trainees in unaccredited positions: Discussion paper. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/workforce/culture/Publications/review-trainees-unaccredited.pdf
Palter, V. N., MacRae, H. M., & Grantcharov, T. P. (2011). Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A Delphi methodology. The American Journal of Surgery, 201(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.031
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). (2011). Surgical workforce projection to 2025. https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/reports-guidelines-publications/workforce-activities-census-reports/RPT_RACS_Workforce-Projection-to-2025_FIN.pdf?rev=f9982c1cce9b46b1bc59774a739ab730&hash=5BBF12D2A53AC2E9653DCE360F1CBE92
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). (2015). Essential surgical skills. https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/morbidity-audits/2015-01-27_gdl_essential_surgical_skills_document.pdf?rev=601613964e4f4cc7a5f7738d00a8108e&hash=554CB82BCAB841B22B45AD94166D98EA
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). (2021). Eligibility report: Procedural skills and professional capabilities. https://www.generalsurgeons.com.au/media/files/Education%20and%20Training/Selection/FRM%202021-01-01%20Procedural%20and%20Professional%20Skills.pdf
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). (2022). RACS core competencies. https://www.surgeons.org/en/Trainees/the-set-program/racs-competencies
Schwab, B., Hungness, E., Barsness, K. A., & McGaghie, W. C. (2017). The role of simulation in surgical education. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Advanced Surgical Techniques, 27(5), 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0644
Zogovic, B., Whereat, S., Cheng, K., Hong, J., & Storey, D. (2021). Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Institute of Academic Surgery skills model: Shifting paradigms in surgical education. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 91(6), 1062–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16673
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.
