A comparison of approaches to teaching clinical skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i3.602Keywords:
clinical education, curriculum development, assessment of clinical skillsAbstract
Background: The most appropriate timing and mode for teaching clinical skills as preparation for medical students’ clinical rotations or clerkships is not widely agreed upon. Increasing pressure on placement opportunities has led to a shift towards simulation-based teaching in the early years of medical training.
Approach: A major curriculum renewal provided an opportunity for comparison of the effectiveness of a largely ward-based (early patient exposure) curriculum with a largely simulation-based one in preparing students for clinical rotations.
Evaluation: We surveyed students from two different programs and invited them to take part in voluntary objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to compare their skills and self-reported preparedness. Qualitative data was also collected from focus groups with a small number of students.
Implications: The findings suggest that the more structured, simulation-based curriculum is at least equivalent to the ward-based approach in teaching clinical skills and preparing students for clinical rotations. Students’ clinical reasoning skills could be enhanced in a simulation-based curriculum through more explicit training to prepare them for being asked questions on clinical placement.
References
Cavuoto Petrizzo, M., Barilla-LaBarca, M. L., Lim, Y. S., Jongco, A. M., Cassara, M., Anglim, J., & Stern, J. N. H. (2019). Utilization of high-fidelity simulation to address challenges with the basic science immunology education of preclinical medical students. BMC Medical Education, 19, Article 352. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1786-5
Duca, N. S., & Glod, S. (2019). Bridging the gap between the classroom and the clerkship: A clinical reasoning curriculum for third-year medical students. MedEdPORTAL, 15, Article 10800. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10800
Fitzgerald, K. M., Denning, T., Vaughan, B. R., Fleischmann, M. J., & Jolly, B. C. (2019). Simulation can offer a sustainable contribution to clinical education in osteopathy. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies, 27, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0252-0
Monrouxe, L. V., Grundy, L., Mann, M., John, Z., Panagoulas, E., Bullock, A., & Mattick, K. (2017). How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? A rapid review of the literature 2009–2014. BMJ Open, 7(1), Article e013656. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013656
Monti, M., Brunet, L., & Michaud, P. A. (2020). Transition to postgraduate practice: Perceptions of preparedness and experience of the daily work of junior residents. Swiss Medical Weekly, 150, Article w20370. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20370
Ryan, M. S., Feldman, M., Bodamer, C., Browning, J., Brock, E., & Grossman, C. (2020). Closing the gap between preclinical and clinical training: Impact of a transition-to-clerkship course on medical students' clerkship performance. Academic Medicine, 95(2), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002934
Surmon, L., Bialocerkowski, A., & Hu, W. (2016). Perceptions of preparedness for the first medical clerkship: A systematic review and synthesis. BMC Medical Education, 16, Article 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0615-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.
