Blockbuster videos: Using complementary video-based learning to augment first-year block-model teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v25i1.568Keywords:
video-based learning, student engagement, block model, health professional education, mixed-methods research, intensive learningAbstract
Introduction: The first year of university is fraught with obstacles and challenges for students. Of particular concern is the often high level of student disengagement encountered at this juncture. Consequently, universities are reimagining what their first-year student experience can be like. The aims of this study were to, firstly, investigate the effects that complementary video-based practical skills resources have on first-year osteopathy student engagement and, secondly, if these effects differ in block-model when compared to traditional-model delivery format.
Methods: This study utilised a two-part mixed-method sequential exploratory design consisting of a quantitative and qualitative survey and focus-group interviews. The quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while the qualitative data were thematically analysed.
Results: The results demonstrated that the majority of students found the video-based learning (VBL) activities to have an overall positive effect on their learning experience and that VBL improved their perceived psychomotor skill acquisition. Furthermore, the reported positive responses appear to be enhanced in an intensive block-model setting.
Conclusion: VBL appears to be a useful tool for clinical skills training in an intensive-style tertiary education setting. Further research should be performed to see if this effect is seen across other health professions courses.
References
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Barsuk, J. H., Cohen, E. R., Wayne, D. B., Siddall, V. J., & McGaghie, W. C. (2016). Developing a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum: Lessons from 11 years of advanced cardiac life support. Simulation in Healthcare, 11(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000120
Bevan, S. J., Chan, C. W., & Tanner, J. A. (2014). Diverse assessment and active student engagement sustain deep learning: A comparative study of outcomes in two parallel introductory biochemistry courses. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(6), 474–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20824
Burton, S., & Nesbit, P. L. (2008). Block or traditional? An analysis of student choice of teaching format. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(1), 4–19. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/block-or-traditional-an-analysis-of-student-choice-of-teaching-fo
Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 215–227. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1904_3
Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.004
Clocksin, B. D., & Greicar, M. B. (2017). Sustained engagement experiences in kinesiology: An engaged department initiative. Kinesiology Review, 6(4), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2017-0036
Daniel, E. L. (2000). A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines. College Student Journal, 34(2), 298–308. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=ffb2d41e-4a92-31ac-b9a9-b52f0563986e
de Lima Lopes, J., Negrao Baptista, R. C., Takao Lopes, C., Bertelli Rossi, M., Swanson, E. A., & Bottura Leite de Barros, A. L. (2019). Efficacy of a video during bed bath simulation on improving the performance of psychomotor skills of nursing undergraduates: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 99, Article 103333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.001
Delgado, A. H. A., Almeida, J. P. R., Mendes, L. S. B., Oliveira, I. N., Ezequiel, O. D. S., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2018). Are surface and deep learning approaches associated with study patterns and choices among medical students? A cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 136(5), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0200060818
Dixon, L., & O’Gorman, V. (2019). "Block teaching": Exploring lecturers’ perceptions of intensive modes of delivery in the context of undergraduate education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2018.1564024
Dolmans, D., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 21(5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2019). Students’ perceptions of assessment quality related to their learning approaches and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.005
Gonzalez, L., & Kardong-Edgren, S. (2017). Deliberate practice for mastery learning in nursing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.10.005
Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2013). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.733689
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43, 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387
Jang, H. W., & Kim, K.-J. (2014). Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: Benefits and challenges. BMC Medical Education, 14, Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-56
Khan, K., & Ramachandran, S. (2012). Conceptual framework for performance assessment: competency, competence and performance in the context of assessments in healthcare: Deciphering the terminology. Medical Teacher, 34(11), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.722707
Klein, R., Kelly, K., Sinnayah, P., & Winchester, M. (2020). The block model intensive learning at university favours low achieving students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(9).
Koch, J., Andrew, S., Salamonson, Y., Everett, B., & Davidson, P. M. (2010). Nursing students' perception of a web-based intervention to support learning. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 584–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.005
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2019). What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2183–2195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1482267
McGaghie, W. C. (2015). Mastery learning: It is time for medical education to join the 21st century. Academic Medicine, 90(11), 1438–1441. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000911
McGaghie, W. C., Barsuk, J. H., Cohen, E. R., Kristopaitis, T., & Wayne, D. B. (2015). Dissemination of an innovative mastery learning curriculum grounded in implementation science principles: A case study. Academic Medicine, 90(11), 1487–1494. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000907
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011). Medical education featuring mastery learning with deliberate practice can lead to better health for individuals and populations. Academic Medicine, 86(11), e8–e9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308d37
Mota, P., Carvalho, N., Carvalho-Dias, E., Joao Costa, M., Correia-Pinto, J., & Lima, E. (2018). Video-based surgical learning: Improving trainee education and preparation for surgery. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(3), 828–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.027
Reedy, G. B. (2015). Using cognitive load theory to inform simulation design and practice. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(8), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.004
Rhodes, K. M., Savovic, J., Elbers, R., Jones, H. E., Higgins, J. P. T., Sterne, J. A. C., Welton, N. J., & Turner, R. M. (2020). Adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis: Combining data-based evidence on bias with detailed trial assessment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 183(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12485
Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3
Stebbings, S., Bagheri, N., Perrie, K., & Blyth, P. (2012). Blended learning and curriculum renewal across three medical schools: The rheumatology module at the University of Otago. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.795
Strayer, J. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1189523914
Tripodi, N. (2018). First-year osteopathic students' use and perceptions of complementary video-based learning. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 30, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.09.004
Tripodi, N., Kelly, K., Husaric, M., Wospil, R., Fleischmann, M., Johnston, S., & Harkin, K. (2020). The impact of three-dimensional printed anatomical models on first-year student engagement in a block-mode delivery. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(6), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1958
Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Weeks, B. K., & Horan, S. A. (2013). A video-based learning activity is effective for preparing physiotherapy students for practical examinations. Physiotherapy, 99(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2013.02.002
Witkowski, P., & Cornell, T. (2015). An investigation into student engagement in higher education classrooms. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.46504/10201505wi
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3–4), 122–135. Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014, 01 / 01 /). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives [Article]. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3–-4), 122–-135.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.
