Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544Keywords:
qualitative content analysis, inductive content analysis, qualitative research methodsAbstract
Inductive content analysis (ICA), or qualitative content analysis, is a method of qualitative data analysis well-suited to use in health-related research, particularly in relatively small-scale, non-complex research done by health professionals undertaking research-focused degree courses. For those new to qualitative research, the methodological literature on ICA can be difficult to navigate, as it employs a wide variety of terminology and gives a number of different descriptions of when and how to carry it out.
In this article, we describe in plain language what ICA is, highlight how it differs from deductive content analysis and thematic analysis, and discuss the key aspects to consider when making decisions about employing ICA in qualitative research. Using a study investigating practices and views around genetic testing in children as an example, we provide a clear step-by-step account of analysing text using ICA.
Clear guidance on ICA will be useful for beginning researchers, especially those more familiar with quantitative biomedical and behavioural research, and for their academic and professional supervisors.References
Ahuvia, A. (2001). Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011087813505
Bennett, D., Barrett, A., & Helmich, E. (2019). How to analyse qualitative data in different ways. The Clinical Teacher, 16(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12973
Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209403
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.13.4.84.s4
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. The Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Hansen, E. C. (2006). Successful qualitative health research. Allen & Unwin.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Demystifying content analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113
Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
Liamputtong, P. (2020). Qualitative research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lichtman, M. (2014). Qualitative research for the social sciences. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544307756
Morse, J. M. (1994). “Emerging from the data”: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23–43). Sage.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Schick-Makaroff, K., MacDonald, M., Plummer, M., Burgess, J., & Neander, W. (2016). What synthesis methodology should I use? A review and analysis of approaches to research synthesis. AIMS Public Health, 3(1), 172–215. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.172
Sousa, D. (2014). Validation in qualitative research: General aspects and specificities of the descriptive phenomenological method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.853855
Thayer, A., Evans, M., McBride, A., Queen, M., & Spyridakis, J. (2007). Content analysis as a best practice in technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.37.3.c
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Thorne, S., Kirkham, S. R., & O'Flynn-Magee, K. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300101
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Vears, D. F., Delany, C., Massie, J., & Gillam, L. (2016). Why do parents want to know their child’s carrier status? A qualitative study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(6), 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9964-7
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited.
Zolnoori, M., Balls-Berry, J. E., Brockman, T. A., Patten, C. A., Huang, M., & Yao, L. (2019). A systematic framework for analyzing patient-generated narrative data: Protocol for a content analysis. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(8), 13914. https://doi.org/10.2196/13914
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
On acceptance for publication in FoHPE the copyright of the manuscript is signed over to ANZAHPE, the publisher of FoHPE.
