The health service impact of an occupational therapy practice placement model: Student-resourced service delivery of groups

Authors

  • Amanda Pigott Princess Alexandra Hospital http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6254-0788
  • Freyr Patterson The University of Queensland
  • Stephen Birch The University of Queensland
  • Padrig Oakley The University of Queensland
  • Emmah Doig The University of Queensland
  • "Impact of SRSD of groups placement" project team

Keywords:

program evaluation, students, occupational therapy, student-resourced service delivery, rehabilitation services

Abstract

Introduction: Student-resourced service delivery of groups is a practice education placement model in which students deliver therapy to groups, with graded supervision. This study examined an application of this model in occupational therapy to determine its costs to the health service and impact on hospital rehabilitation throughput and patient outcomes.

Methods: Retrospectively collected data were compared between periods when groups were student-resourced and staff-resourced. Patient data were analysed separately to group data.

Results: Seventeen patients received staff-resourced group therapy, and 52 patients received student-resourced group therapy, with no statistically significant differences identified in the characteristics of patients between group types. There was no evidence student-resourced therapy was associated with change in patient rehabilitation outcomes or length of rehabilitation stay.

Student-resourced therapy groups had an average duration of 10.8 minutes per session shorter (95% CI: 3.7, 18.0 P: 0.002) than staff-resourced groups. Under the student-resourced groups placement model, mean clinician time per group—both direct patient time and time spent on group facilitation—was not adversely affected and was reduced for occupational therapy assistants’ direct time (mean difference -7.6 minutes, 95% CI: 0.8, -16.0 P: 0.04) and for occupational therapists’ indirect time (mean difference -30.28 minutes 95% CI: -1.0, -59.6 P:0.02). Despite an implied mean cost savings per group of $49.61 under the student-resourced model, there was no evidence of any statistically significant impact on overall costs.

Conclusions: Student-resourced service delivery of rehabilitation groups provide an opportunity for student practice education placements and do not appear to negatively impact occupational therapists’ time, costs or patient outcomes.

Author Biographies

Amanda Pigott, Princess Alexandra Hospital

Clinical Specialist

Occupational Therapy

Princess Alexandra Hospital

 

Honorary Research Fellow

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

The University of Queensland

Freyr Patterson, The University of Queensland

Lecturer

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

University of Queensland

Stephen Birch, The University of Queensland

Taylor Chair and Centre Director

Centre for Business and Economics of Health,

University of Queensland

Padrig Oakley, The University of Queensland

Centre for Business and Economics of Health,

University of Queensland

"Impact of SRSD of groups placement" project team

 

Cate Fitzgerald1

Jennifer Fleming4

Sue Laracy2

Amy McKenzie2

Jacqueline Searles3

Jenny Strong2,4

Giovanna Tornatore2

Mary Whitehead3

1Occupational Therapy, Logan Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia 

2Occupational Therapy, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia 

3Occupational Therapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia 

4School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia 

References

Beck, E. (2005). The UCSD student-run free clinic project: Transdisciplinary health professional education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 16(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2005.0026

Bourne, E., McAllister, L., Nagarajan, S., & Short, K. (2019). The effect of speech-language pathology students on clinician time use and activity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1416175

Bourne, E., Short, K., McAllister, L., & Nagarajan, S. (2019). The quantitative impact of placements on allied health time use and productivity in healthcare facilities: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 20(2), 8–40. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v20i2.315

Drum, D., Swanbrow Becker, M., & Hess, E. (2011). Expanding the application of group interventions: Emergence of groups in health care settings. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 36(4), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2011.613902

Gustafsson, L., Brown, T., McKinstry, C., & Caine, A.-M. (2016). Practice education: A snapshot from Australian university programmes. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12337

Hamilton, A., Copley, J., Thomas, Y., Edwards, A., Broadbridge, J., Bonassi, M., Fitzgerald, C., & Newton, J. (2015). Responding to the growing demand for practice education: Are we building sustainable solutions? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(4), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12181

Hamilton, B., Granger, C., & Sherwin, F. (1987). A uniform national system for medical rehabilitation. In M. Fuhrer (Ed.), Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement (pp. 137–147). Brookes.

Hammond, F. M., Barrett, R., Dijkers, M. P., Zanca, J. M., Horn, S. D., Smout, R. J., Guerrier, T., Hauser, E., & Dunning, M. R. (2015). Group therapy use and its impact on the outcomes of inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: Data from traumatic brain injury–Practice based evidence project. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(8), S282–S292.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.029

Higgins, S., Schwartzberg, S., Bedell, G., & Duncombe, L. (2015). Current practice and perceptions of group work in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(Suppl. 1). https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.69S1-PO7096

Kent, F., Martin, N., & Keating, J. (2016). Interprofessional student-led clinics: An innovative approach to the support of older people in the community. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1070133

Larkin, H., & Watchorn, V. (2012). Changes and challenges in higher education: What is the impact on fieldwork education? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(6), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12002

Lewis, L. (2005). Fieldwork requirements of the past, present, and future. Special Interest Quarterly, 15, 1–4.

McBride, L.-J., Fitzgerald, C., Costello, C., & Perkins, K. (2020). Allied health pre-entry student clinical placement capacity: Can it be sustained? Australian Health Review, 44(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah18088

McBride, L.-J., Fitzgerald, C., Morrison, L., & Hulcombe, J. (2015). Pre-entry student clinical placement demand: Can it be met? Australian Health Review, 39(5), 577–581. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14156

McCarthy, C. J., & Hart, S. (2011). Designing groups to meet evolving challenges in health care settings. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 36(4), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2011.614143

Nisbet, G., McAllister, S., Morris, C., & Jennings, M. (2021). Moving beyond solutionism: Re‐imagining placements through an activity systems lens. Medical Education, 55(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14345

Ozelie, R., Janow, J., Kreutz, C., Mulry, M. K., & Penkala, A. (2014). Supervision of occupational therapy Level II fieldwork students: Impact on and predictors of clinician productivity. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.013532

Patterson, F., Caine, A.-M., Ninness, N., Griffin, J., & Fleming, J. (2019). The student-led groups program model of practice education: Pilot evaluation from the perspective of service provider and university stakeholders. Australian Journal of Clinical Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.11465

Patterson, F., Doig, E., Fleming, J., Strong, J., Birch, S., Whitehead, M., Laracy, S., Fitzgerald, C., Tornatore, G., McKenzie, A., Searles, J., & Pigott, A. (2021). Student-resourced service delivery of occupational therapy rehabilitation groups: Patient, clinician and student perspectives about the ingredients for success. Disability and Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1922517

Patterson, F., Fleming, J., & Doig, E. (2017). Clinician perceptions about inpatient occupational therapy groups in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 31(8), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1296974

Patterson, F., Fleming, J., & Doig, E. (2019). Patient perceptions of participation in group-based rehabilitation in an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation setting. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.001

Patterson, F., Fleming, J., Marshall, K., & Ninness, N. (2017). Student perspectives of a student-led groups program model of professional practice education in a brain injury rehabilitation unit. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(5), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12382

Queensland Health. (2018). Fact sheet: Student placement models: Student resourced service delivery. Author.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Pigott, A., Patterson, F., Birch, S., Oakley, P., Doig, E. ., & project team, "Impact of S. of groups placement". (2022). The health service impact of an occupational therapy practice placement model: Student-resourced service delivery of groups. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 23(2), 21–34. Retrieved from https://fohpe.org/FoHPE/article/view/525

Issue

Section

Articles