Discussion Paper: Conceptual thresholds in health professional education research and scholarship

Koshila Kumar, Svetlana King, Amy Seymour-Walsh

Abstract


Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are increasingly undertaking health professional education (HPE) research and scholarship. This discussion paper highlights key transition points experienced by HCPs newly engaging in HPE research and scholarship, using conceptual thresholds as a theoretical lens. The identified thresholds are: (1) recognising limits, (2) navigating discourses and (3) negotiating identities, and our paper evidences the epistemic, discursive and existential repositioning underpinning these thresholds. Supporting HCPs to successfully navigate the rich and vibrant world of HPE research and scholarship requires a multi-faceted strategy involving individual upskilling, co-construction of resources and strategies, and enhancing the invitational quality of HPE research activities, environments and communities.


Keywords


health professional education research; conceptual thresholds; faculty development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albert, M. (2004). Understanding the debate on medical education research: A sociological perspective. Academic Medicine, 79(10), 948–954. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410000-00009

Albert, M., Hodges, B., & Regehr, G. (2007). Research in medical education: Balancing service and science. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2

Baillie, C., Bowden, J. A., & Meyer, J. H. (2013). Threshold capabilities: Threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. Higher Education, 65(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9540-5

Billett, S. (2001). Co-participation: Affordance and engagement at work. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(92), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.41

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Bunniss, S., & Kelly, D. R. (2010). Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical Education, 44(4), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x

Cantillon, P., Dornan, T., & De, W. G. (2019). Becoming a clinical teacher: Identity formation in context. Academic Medicine, 94(10), 1610–1618. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002403

Clouder, L. (2005). Caring as a “threshold concept”: Transforming students in higher education into health (care) professionals. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500239141

Cousin, G. (2010). Neither teacher-centred nor student-centred: Threshold concepts and research partnerships. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i2.64

Denniston, C., & Tai, J. (2020). Paradigm shifts during higher degrees by research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(1), 98–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13002

Dzara, K., & Kesselheim, J. (2018). Going up? Tips for the medical educator’s “Elevator Pitch.” Academic Medicine, 93(12), 1884. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002393

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Heyns, T., Bresser, P., Buys, T., Coetzee, I., Korkie, E., White, Z., & Mc Cormack, B. (2019). Twelve tips for supervisors to move towards person-centered research supervision in health care sciences. Medical Teacher, 41(12), 1353–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1533241

Hu, W., Thistlethwaite, J., Weller, J., Gallego, G., Monteith, J., & McColl, G. (2015). “It was serendipity”: A qualitative study of academic careers in medical education. Medical Education, 49(11), 1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12822

International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine. (2004). ICRAM (The International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine): Agenda setting. BMJ, 329(7469), 787–789. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7469.787

Irby, D. M. (1990). Shifting paradigms of research in medical education. Academic Medicine, 65(10), 622–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199010000-00002

Keefer, J. M. (2015). Experiencing doctoral liminality as a conceptual threshold and how supervisors can use it. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981839

Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930

Kneebone, R. (2002). Total internal reflection: An essay on paradigms. Medical Education, 36(6), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01224.x

Kumar, K., Roberts, C., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2011). Entering and navigating academic medicine: Academic clinician-educators’ experiences. Medical Education, 45(5), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03887.x

Kuper, A., & D’Eon, M. (2011). Rethinking the basis of medical knowledge. Medical Education, 45(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03791.x

Lingard, L. (2015). Joining a conversation: The problem/gap/hook heuristic. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(5), 252–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0211-y

Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2016). It’s a story, not a study: Writing an effective research paper. Academic Medicine, 91(12), e12. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001389

Mann, K. V. (2011). Theoretical perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future possibilities. Medical Education, 45(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x

McGaghie, W. C. (2009). Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43. Medical Teacher, 31(7), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903050366

Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5

Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966273

Milligan, A., & Wood, B. (2010). Conceptual understandings as transition points: Making sense of a complex social world. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(4), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903494287

Molloy, E., & Bearman, M. (2019). Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility: “Intellectual candour” in health professions education. Medical Education, 53(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13649

Neve, H., Wearn, A., & Collett, T. (2016). What are threshold concepts and how can they inform medical education? Medical Teacher, 38(8), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112889

Ng, S. L. (2013). Theory and research in audiology education: Understanding and representing complexity through informed methodological decisions. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(5), 344–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.24.5.2

Nisbet, G., McAllister, S., Morris, C., & Jennings, M. (2020). Moving beyond solutionism: Re-imagining placements through an activity systems lens. Medical Education, 55(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14345

Rees, C., & Monrouxe, L. (2010). Theory in medical education research: How do we get there? Medical Education, 44(4), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03615.x

Regehr, G. (2010). It’s NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x

Samuel, A., Konopasky, A., Schuwirth, L. W., King, S. M., & Durning, S. J. (2020). Five principles for using educational theory: Strategies for advancing health professions education research. Academic Medicine, 95(4), 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003066

Sarangi, S. (2010). Practising discourse analysis in healthcare settings. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. de Vries (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 397–416). Sage.

https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268247.n21

Schön, D. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673

Schuwirth, L. W., & Durning, S. J. (2018). Educational research: Current trends, evidence base and unanswered questions. Medical Journal of Australia, 208(4), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00805

Scott, K., Caldwell, P., & Schuwirth, L. (2015). Ten steps to conducting health professional education research. The Clinical Teacher, 12(4), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12287

Smith, C., & Boyd, P. (2012). Becoming an academic: The reconstruction of identity by recently appointed lecturers in nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.647784

Steinert, Y. (2014). Faculty development in the health professions: A focus on research and practice (Vol. 11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7612-8

Steinert, Y., O’Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2019). Strengthening teachers’ professional identities through faculty development. Academic Medicine, 94(7), 963–968. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002695

Stoddard, H. A., & Brownfield, E. D. (2016). Clinician–educators as dual professionals: A contemporary reappraisal. Academic Medicine, 91(7), 921–924. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001210

Tavakol, M., Murphy, R., Rahimi Madiseh, M., & Torabi, S. (2008). The involvement of clinicians in medical education research. Quality in Primary Care, 16(5), 335–340. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18973714/

Thistlethwaite, J., Kumar, K., & Roberts, C. (2016). Interprofessionalism and professional identity formation. In R. Cruess, S. Cruess, & Y. Steinert (Eds.), Teaching medical professionalism: Supporting the development of a professional identity (pp. 140–154). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316178485.012

Thomas, J. (2019). The clinician educator as qualitative researcher. The Clinical Teacher, 16(6), 646–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12977

Tsuei, S. H-T., Lee, D., Ho, C., Regehr, G., & Nimmon, L. (2019). Exploring the construct of psychological safety in medical education. Academic Medicine, 94(11S), S28–S35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002897

van Lankveld, T., Thampy, H., Cantillon, P., Horsburgh, J., & Kluijtmans, M. (2020). Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 132. Medical Teacher, 43(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838463

Varpio, L. (2018). Using rhetorical appeals to credibility, logic, and emotions to increase your persuasiveness. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(3), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0420-2

Wisker, G. (2015). Developing doctoral authors: Engaging with theoretical perspectives through the literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981841

Wisker, G., & Savin-Baden, M. (2009). Priceless conceptual thresholds: Beyond the “stuck place” in writing. London Review of Education, 7(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460903290207

Woodward-Kron, R. (2020). Let’s talk about discourse analysis for health professional education: What, why and how. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 21(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v21i2.470




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v22i2.445

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.