Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Focus on Methodology: A sense of sociomaterialism: How sociomaterial perspectives might illuminate health professions education

Sarah Burm, Anna MacLeod

Abstract


Emerging from the field of socio-technical studies (STS), “sociomaterial” refers to a diverse group of theoretical approaches that, broadly speaking, share a commitment to symmetrically privileging both social and material elements. Not surprisingly, the ways in which a sociomaterial researcher engages in the process of collecting and analysing data will differ from studies that foreground a more human-centered point of view. 

This paper introduces researchers to the principles informing sociomaterial research and demonstrates their application in the context of a problem that has reached rampant levels among healthcare professionals—burnout. In this paper, we provide an accessible, in-depth description of what we mean by the sociomaterial, describe its historical roots and elucidate what it means to engage in empirical sociomaterial work. In so doing, our goal is to illuminate the potential of sociomaterial studies for exploring the complexity of health professions education.


Keywords


sociomateriality; materiality; ethnography; health professions education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aagaard, J., & Matthiesen, N. (2016). Methods of materiality: Participant observation and qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1090510

Abildgaard, M. S. (2018). My whole life in telephones: Material artifacts as interview elicitation devices. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797795

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 2(3), 801–831. https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/sv/sai/SOSANT4400/v14/pensumliste/barad_posthumanist-performativity.pdf

Bauchspies, J., Croissant, W., & Restivo, S. (2006). Science, technology and society: Asociological approach. Blackwell.

Contractor, N. S., Monge, P. R., & Leonardi, P. M. (2011). Multidimensionalnetworks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing technology inside the network. International Journal of Communication, 5, 682–720. http://

ascnetworksnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/IJoC-Network-Theory-2011-ContractorMongeLeonardi.pdf

Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2010). Technological objects, social positions and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.06

Fenwick, T. (2014). Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: Attuning to what matters. Medical Education, 48(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12295

Fenwick, T., & Nimmo, G. (2015). Making visible what matters: Sociomaterial approaches for research and practice in healthcare education. In J. A. Cleland & S. J. Durning (Eds.), Researching medical education (pp. 67–79). John Wiley and Sons.

Hassan, N. R. (2016). Editorial: A brief history of the material in sociomateriality. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 47(4), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025099.3025101

Hultin, L. (2019). On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology. Information and Organization, 29(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.004

Kallinikos, J. (2006). Information out of information: On the self-referential dynamics of information growth. Information Technology and People, 19(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840610649989

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In E. Wiebe Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network theory. Oxford University Press.

Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.

Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford University Press.

MacLeod A., Cameron, P., Ajjawi, R., Kits, O., & Tummons, J. (2019). Actor network theory and ethnography: Sociomaterial approaches to researching medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(3), 177–186.

MacLeod, A., & Ajjawi, R. (2020). Thinking sociomaterially: Why matter matters in medical education. Academic Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi. org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003143

Mutch, A. (2013). Sociomateriality: Taking the wrong turning? Information and Organization, 23(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.001

Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875

Nordstrom, S. N. (2018). Antimethodology: Postqualitative generative conventions. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704469

Nordquist, J., Chan, M. K., Maniate, J., Cook, D., Kelly, C., & McDougall, A. (2019). Examining the clinical learning environment through the architectural avenue. Medical Teacher, 41(4), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/014215

X.2019.1566603

Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 433– 474. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211644

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138

Parmiggiani, E., & Mikalsen, M. (2013). The facets of sociomateriality: A systematic mapping of emerging concepts and definitions. In M. Aanestad & T. Bratteteig (Eds.), Nordic contributions in IS research, SCIS 2013: Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 156) (pp. 87–103). Springer.

Roehl, T. (2012a). Disassembling the classroom: An ethnographic approach to the materiality of education. Ethnography and Education, 7(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2012.661591

Roehl, T. (2012b). From witnessing to recording: Material objects and the epistemic configuration of science classes. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 20(1),49–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649415

Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Sociomateriality: Taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch. Information and Organization, 23, 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.003




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v21i1.443

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.