Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Gender matters: Students’ perceptions of peer learning in clinical education

Joanna Tai, Benedict Canny, Elizabeth Molloy, Terry Haines

Abstract


Introduction: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is an increasingly used learning method, with demonstrated equivalence to conventional teaching methods in students’ knowledge and skill gain. Despite this, student satisfaction with PAL is varied. There are few investigations of gender as a factor influencing students’ perceptions of peer-assisted learning, and less is known about gender’s impact on participation in PAL.

Methods: This study investigated the influence of gender on students’ attitudes towards, and participation in, PAL activities. One hundred ninety-one students in their first clinical year completed a self-report questionnaire over a 3-year period. The questionnaire included questions on engagement in specific PAL activities and the advantages and disadvantages of PAL.

Results: Male and female students reported similar participation rates in PAL activities. Female students were more likely to report that observing others undertake a history or examination was useful to their learning. Female students were also more likely to report that PAL provided a “safe” learning environment, allowing them to take more time, let down their guard and ask questions.

Conclusions: Variation in students’ attitudes when introducing PAL activities may affect their uptake. Gender is unlikely to be the sole factor affecting perceptions of PAL, but it may have an impact on readiness to engage and patterns of engagement. The perceived relative safety of PAL identified in this study, when contrasted to recent reports of bullying and harassment within medical training in Australia, may suggest that educating clinicians and students on the role of PAL could result in safer learning environments and improve learner experiences.


Keywords


Peer-assisted learning; gender; clinical education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Babaria, P., Bernheim, S., & Nunez-Smith, M. (2011). Gender and the pre-clinical experiences of female medical students: A taxonomy. Medical Education, 45, 249–260. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03856.x

Bearman, M., Molloy, E., Ajjawi, R., & Keating, J. (2013). “Is there a plan B?”: Clinical educators supporting underperforming students in practice settings. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 531–544. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.752732

Blackman, I., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2004). Graduate-entry medical student variables that predict academic and clinical achievement. International Education Journal, 4(4), 30–41.

Blanch, D. C., Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Frankel, R. M. (2008). Medical student gender and issues of confidence. Patient Education and Counseling, 72, 374–381. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.021

Burgess, A., McGregor, D., & Mellis, C. (2014). Medical students as peer tutors: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 115. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-115

Carney, P. A., Dietrich, A. J., Eliassen, S., Pipas, C., & Donahue, D. (2000). Differences in ambulatory teaching and learning by gender match of preceptors and students. Family Medicine, 32(9), 618–623.

Cushing, A., Abbott, S., Lothian, D., Hall, A., & Westwood, O. M. R. (2011). Peer feedback as an aid to learning—What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now! Medical Teacher, 33(2), e105–e112.

Hulsman, R. L., Harmsen, A. B., & Fabriek, M. (2009). Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: Assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(2), 142–149.

Ivory, K., & Scott, K. (2015). Let’s stop the bullying of trainee doctors—for patients’ sake. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/lets-stop-the-bullying-of-trainee-doctors-for-patients-sake-42243

Kassab, S., Abu-Hijleh, M., Al-Shboul, Q., & Hamdy, H. (2005). Gender-related differences in learning in student-led PBL tutorials. Education for Health, 18(2), 272–282. doi:10.1080/13576280500148577

Knobe, M., Holschen, M., Mooij, S. C., Sellei, R. M., Münker, R., Antony, P., . . . Pape, H.-C. (2012). Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: A randomised controlled trial. European Spine Journal, 21(5), 992–998. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2140-8

Kommalage, M., Thabrew, H., & Kommelage, M. (2011). Student-led peer-assisted learning: The Kuppi experience at the medical school of the University of Ruhuna in Sri Lanka. Education for Health, 24(2), 12.

Krych, A. J., March, C. N., Bryan, R. E., Peake, B. J., Pawlina, W., & Carmichael, S. W. (2005). Reciprocal peer teaching: Students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory. Clinical Anatomy, 18(4), 296–301. doi:10.1002/ca.20090

Lempp, H., & Seale, C. (2006). Medical students’ perceptions in relation to ethnicity and gender: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 6, 17. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-17

Lincoln, M. A., & McAllister, L. (1993). Peer learning in clinical education. Medical Teacher, 15(1), 17–25.

Low, T. (2014, May 5). Beating bullies. MJA Insight. Retrieved from http://www.doctorportal.com.au/mjainsight/2014/15/trish-low-beating-bullies/

Medew, J. (2015, May 24). Medical students under pressure amid reports of bullying in Australian hospitals. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/national/medical-students-under-pressure-amid-reports-of-bullying-in-australian-hospitals-20150524-gh8jq5.html

Papinczak, T., Young, L., Groves, M., & Haynes, M. (2007). An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. Medical Teacher, 29(5), e122–e132. doi:10.1080/01421590701294323

Raghunath, S., Tai, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2011). Evaluating a near-peer mentorship program for medical students. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Health Professional Educators (ANZAHPE) Conference, Alice Springs, Australia.

Rees, C. (2003). Self-assessment scores and gender. Medical Education, 37, 572–573. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01544.x

Tai, J., Haines, T. P., Canny, B. J., & Molloy, E. K. (2014). A study of medical students’ peer learning on clinical placements: What they have taught themselves to do. Journal of Peer Learning, 7, 57–80.

Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Introduction to peer-assisted learning. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tsouroufli, M., Rees, C. E., Monrouxe, L. V., & Sundaram, V. (2011). Gender, identities and intersectionality in medical education research. Medical Education, 45, 213–216. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03908.x

Verdonk, P., Räntzsch, V., de Vries, R., & Houkes, I. (2014). Show what you know and deal with stress yourself: A qualitative interview study of medical interns’ perceptions of stress and gender. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 96. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-96

Vnuk, A. K., Wearn, A., & Rees, C. E. (2016). The influence of students’ gender on equity in peer physical examination: A qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9699-0

Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Lingard, L. (2014). Learning culture and feedback: An international study of medical athletes and musicians. Medical Education, 48(7), 713–723. doi:org/10.1111/medu.12407

Wayne, N. L., Vermillion, M., & Uijtdehaage, S. (2010). Gender differences in leadership amongst first-year medical students in the small-group setting. Academic Medicine, 85(8), 1276–1281. doi:org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5f2ce

Weyrich, P., Schrauth, M., Kraus, B., Habermehl, D., Netzhammer, N., Zipfel, S., . . . Jünger, J. (2008). Undergraduate technical skills training guided by student tutors: Analysis of tutors’ attitudes, tutees’ acceptance and learning progress in an innovative teaching model. BMC Medical Education, 8, 18. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-18

Yu, T., Wilson, N., & Singh, P. (2011). Medical students-as-teachers: A systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2, 157–172.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v18i1.203

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.