“Let’s not reinvent the wheel”: A qualitative investigation of collaboration in the Australian GP education and training sector

Bianca Denny; Andrea Chester; James Brown

doi:10.11157/fohpe.v17i1.121

Authors

Bianca Denny RMIT University
Andrea Chester RMIT University
James Brown Southern GP Training

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v17i1.121

Keywords:

e-learning, collaboration, medical education, general practice training

Abstract

Introduction: E-learning collaboration in the Australian GP education and training sector represents one way to improve sustainability, innovation and reuse of existing data sources. However, few collaborative e-learning projects are currently undertaken within the sector, with previous joint ventures resulting in variable success. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of increased e-learning collaboration, with specific focus on exploration of the beliefs and perceptions of key stakeholders within the GP education and training sector.

Methods: A total of 78 personnel and 16 CEOs participated in focus groups and interviews held at training sites across Australia. Independent and group qualitative analysis was used to derive key themes.

Results: Six key themes related to e-learning collaboration were identified: benefits of e-learning collaboration, maintaining focus on educational outcomes, competitiveness within the RTP sector, individual identity and regional differences, establishing relationships and enablers to promoting collaboration.

Conclusions: Considerable goodwill and enthusiasm towards collaboration exists within the sector. Congruent with established literature regarding collaboration, key recommendations are detailed for the advancement of prospective collaborative e-learning projects, including a need for early and ongoing stakeholder engagement, a focus on educational outcomes, respect for matters of individual identity and consideration of regional differences.

References

Alves, P., & Uhomoibhi, J. (2010). Issues of e-learning standards and identity management for mobility and collaboration in higher education. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27, 79–90. doi:10.1108/10650741011033053

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255–262.

Childs, S., Blenkinsopp, E., Hall, A., & Walton, G. (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students: Barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature: Findings from the HeXL project. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(2), 20–32.

Connolly, M., Jones, C., & Jones, N. (2007). Managing collaboration across further and higher education: A case in practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(2), 159–169.

Czajkowski, J. M. (2006). Success factors in higher education collaborations: A collaboration success measurement model. Unpublished docteral dissertation, Capella University.

Davies, B. S., Rafique, J., Vincent, T. R., Fairclough, J., Packer, M. H., Vinent, R., & Haq, I. (2012). Mobile medical education (MoMEd): How mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students—a mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education, 12(1), 1–11.

Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008). AMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 30, 455–473. doi:10.1080/01421590802108331

Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Health Workforce Australia (HWA). (2011). National health workforce innovation and reform strategic framework for action 2011–2015. Adelaide, Australia: Author.

Mason, J., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Trust, collaboration, e-learning and organisational transformation. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 259–270.

Mathiassen, L. (2002). Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People, 15, 321–345. doi:10.1108/09593840210453115

Mattessich, P. W., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. R. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work (2nd ed.). St Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.

Mehra, B. (2002). Bias in qualitative research: Voices from an online classroom. The Qualitative Report, 7(1), 13–17.

Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.

QSR. (2012). NVivo 10 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www. qsrinternational.com

Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.

Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. Research in Learning Technology, 13(3).

Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 13(2), 145–159.

Tam, C. W. M., & Eastwood, A. (2012). Available, intuitive and free! Building e-learning modules using web 2.0 services. Medical Teacher, 34, 1078–1080. doi:1 0.3109/0142159X.2012.731105

Taylor-Powell, E., Rossing, B., & Geran, J. (1998). Evaluating collaboratives: Reaching the potential. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

Trumble, S. C. (2011). The evolution of general practice training in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 194(11), S59–S62.